Warning sign? Or hate speech? Sign raises alarm at UM.


I saw this sign posted Thursday on a kiosk outside Main Hall at the University of Montana.

It definitely caught my eye, and I sent a picture out on Twitter.

Soon after, vice president of integrated communications Peggy Kuhr called and said the sign had been removed because it could fall into the category of hate speech.

She also said the Title IX office had been alerted and campus police would be as well.

Kuhr said she did not want the sign posted on Twitter: “The key here is that we take special care not to disseminate hateful speech.”

She also said UM was going to look for similar signs on campus and take any others down.

“It’s distressing, and it’s taken seriously,” Kuhr said.

I don’t know if it’s hate speech, or of it’s a campaign warning women. I hypothesized that a woman who had been attacked in the past posted the sign, but I don’t know the source.

UM had, in the past, a rape problem. Missoulian reporter Gwen Florio brought the problem to light several years ago, Jon Krakauer wrote a book about it this year, and he said the problem was prevalent on campuses across the country.

By many accounts, UM has gone to great lengths to raise awareness about sexual violence and even take measures to create a culture that protects women.

I think the sign shows the issue is still fresh for some people on campus. Regardless, it was an interesting thing to run across, and so I shared it.

I’ve shared pictures of farmers market veggies on campus, and the tasty lunch from the taco truck at the oval, and no doubt, I’ll be sending out some pictures that are maddening to officials.

I hope it all gives people a window into the Missoula campus. It’s a cool place, sign or no sign.

– Keila Szpaller

Stacy Rye will be good for media

Photo editor Kurt Wilson captured the look on Stacy Rye’s face. I think it’s happiness and surprise all at the same time.

In September, Rye will be sworn in as a county commissioner, replacing Bill Carey. Carey is retiring before the end of his term.

Sometimes, I think process is a sham, and deciders have already made a decision before the process follows its course. In this case, my faith in process was restored a tiny bit.

Early on, Commissioner Jean Curtiss talked about selecting a candidate to replace Carey. She didn’t mention Rye by name, but she said the job differs from city government, and she said commissioners don’t represent just one city ward.

Rye served on the Missoula City Council for eight years, and the comments definitely seemed like a direct notice to the former councilwoman.

I figured the remarks meant she wouldn’t be voting for Rye.

I figured wrong. Curtiss and Commissioner Cola Rowley had to reach consensus on the appointment, and they did on the first try after multiple candidate interviews and at least one questionnaire.

Here’s the comment Curtiss made in Martin Kidston’s story:

(Rye) is the one who is the most ready on Day 1. She has served as an elected official for eight years, has experience with public policy, has knowledge of local government and understands the challenges of the (agricultural) policy.

Also running were Shantelle Gaynor, a longtime county employee, and Jim Parker, who runs campaigns for Democratic candidates.

As a reporter, I’m glad Rye got the job.

Candidates often pledge transparency and media access while they’re campaigning, and once they’ve won, they batten down the hatches. Or cry about coverage. Or throw tantrums. But I digress.

I covered City Hall when Rye was a councilwoman, and I’m pleased someone who talks to media got the commissioner job. I know Rye didn’t like at least some of my City Hall coverage, but she never shied away from talking with the Missoulian.

Gaynor also has a track record of being available to press, and I believe she would have continued to communicate with reporters as well had she been appointed.

In other news, I’ve continued to cover the departures of the state medical examiners. Here’s a story about a family who was told the wrong cause of death for their child by a pathologist the state retained for years despite his problematic track record.

All for now.

– Keila Szpaller


Commissioner will choose from Rye, Gaynor and Parker

Here’s Martin Kidston’s most recent story about replacing Commissioner Bill Carey, who retires in September.

The candidates who made the cut are Stacy Rye, Shantelle Gaynor, and Jim Parker. Rye and Gaynor plan to run in 2016; Parker would serve as a placeholder if selected.

In the story:

In the voting tally, Rye led the pack with 18 votes. Parker received 12, Gaynor five, (Fred) Rice three and (Burt) Caldwell two.

Commissioners Jean Curtiss and Cola Rowley will have to decide if they want to give a candidate a leg up, and choose Gaynor or Rye, or if they want a placeholder.

I think Martin has more coming up.

– Keila Szpaller

Learn about the Missoula commissioner candidates

Reporter Martin Kidston has the latest on the candidates who filed to replace Commissioner Bill Carey when he retires in September. That story here.

The two gals have some deep experience in local government: That’s Shantelle Gaynor and Stacy Rye.

If either of them get the job, it’ll be an all-female commission. Not the first time, but the first time in a while.

The other candidates are Burt Caldwell, Jim Parker and Fred Rice. You can find links to their responses to the Missoula County Democrats’ questionnaire with the story.

Also. Don’t get too close to bison. Or chase fires. Or pet grizzly bears.

Brett French of the Billings Gazette took the photo.

– Keila Szpaller

City wins condemnation case, Carlyle appeals

Here’s a link to the order itself. It’s short and easy to read.

Natasha Jones, a lawyer for the city, said everyone in Missoula should read it.

Here’s a look at some of the interesting things in the judge’s order if you don’t have time to read the whole thing right now.

Here’s a story about the appeal.

Here’s more about the role of Robert Dove of The Carlyle Group in the water case in Missoula.

Here’s reporter Dave Erickson’s story about the Mountain Water Co. employee group’s plan.

C’est tout. Except this bunny picture.

The bunny is a Happy Wednesday for Councilman Jon Wilkins, who recently inquired about Red Tape. If you care to adopt this rabbit, it’s at the Humane Society of Western Montana, and it has a friend, also a bunny, also black and white.

– Keila Szpaller


A roundup of recent coverage of Jon Krakauer’s “Missoula”

krakauerbookcover.image1. Missoulian reporter Kathryn Haake talks with Kelsey Belnap about a letter the Missoula County Attorney sent trying to stop publication of the book. Belnap said County Attorney Kirsten Pabst‘s letter shows she continues to blame victims. “I’m just angry,” Belnap said. “I no longer get sad about this. I get mad. People can be really awful.

2. My story about Pabst’s decision to attend a disciplinary hearing at the University of Montana. Retired Dean of Students Charles Couture said Pabst’s presence was “totally inappropriate.” A longtime member of the Montana State Bar ethics committee said the prosecutor’s participation gave her “great pause” and raised “red flags.”

3. In the Indy, Erika Fredrickson‘s review of “Missoula: Rape and the Justice System in a College Town.” Said Fredrickson about the book: “If you’re not going to read it because your feelings are hurt, you are definitely part of the problem.”

4. Columnist Dan Brooks in the Indy on why we can hate a book we haven’t read. “You can’t write an accurate book about rape and call it Missoula, because rape is bad and Missoula is good. That was the prevailing opinion of Krakauer’s book before anyone read it.”

5. Montana Public Radio’s interview with Gwen Florio, who covered the events in the book and describes Krakauer’s reporting as accurate. In an interview with news director Eric Whitney, Florio said the book is a “faithful representation” of the cases in Missoula: “It is so scrupulously sourced.” Florio won an award for her coverage and is now teaching journalism at the University of Montana. Pabst claimed the book has inaccuracies. “Do tell,” said @jhwygirl on Twitter.

I made a mistake when I wrote about the announcement of the book’s release. I asked Pabst if she had been interviewed by the author, and I didn’t ask enough questions. She said she had not been interviewed, and she also said the author did not contact former County Attorney Fred Van Valkenburg.

I should have followed up to find out if Krakauer had asked Pabst for an interview. In fact, he had done so a few days before I asked her whether she had been interviewed. So Pabst had not been interviewed, but only because she declined to answer questions.

In my story this weekend, Kerry Barrett talks about the way the prosecutor characterized her role in the UM disciplinary hearing. Pabst had said she wasn’t there on any one party’s behalf but as an educational witness who would provide a “civics lesson” to UM. In the book, the author quotes Pabst speaking in support of the accused man.

Said Barrett, a witness at the hearing for the woman who reported the rape: “For years, I’ve been trying to draw attention to this, and (Pabst) kept saying, ‘I wasn’t there on his behalf.’ Now, the truth is in the book. It’s told from transcripts, so she can’t lie anymore.”

Dean Couture*, who presented the case at the 2011 hearing, described Krakauer’s representations in the book as factual and accurate. He’d read the first half of it, which includes information about this hearing. Couture still doesn’t understand the reason Pabst felt compelled to be a witness: “She has not, as far as I’m concerned, made her true intentions for being there clear.”

At the hearing, Barrett observed Pabst and the parents of the accused student acting warmly with each other, as though they were “old friends.” The parents and Pabst both denied they knew each other or had spoken before the hearing. Pabst said if she was friendly, it’s because she’s a friendly person and was warm to everyone she encountered at Main Hall.

That could be. I hope we are asking enough of the right questions to get the whole truth; I’m certain we will sooner or later.

– Keila Szpaller

*Couture said he is still bound by privacy but can discuss material from the case that is now in the public domain.

Some observations from Missoula condemnation court

We’re nearly halfway through the city of Missoula’s condemnation case against Mountain Water Co. and owner The Carlyle Group.

It’s as interesting as I thought it might be. The witnesses are providing fascinating details, and the lawyers are giving some engaging performances.

A couple themes have emerged in testimony so far. One thing I’m curious about is the relationship between Mayor John Engen and Robert Dove, managing director of infrastructure for Carlyle.

From all accounts to this point, it seems like Dove did intend to sell the water utility to the city of Missoula. Bruce Bender, chief administrative officer, remembered an evening with Dove, I think at Finn and Porter, where Dove put his arm around Engen and said, “Mayor, are you ready to buy a water company?”

So what happened? Did someone above Dove’s head shut it down? Did they figure they could get more from someone else? Then why not counter?

Last March, Dove answered written questions from the Missoulian, and I just took another look at them. They didn’t help me with my new questions, but I’m putting them here and follow ups here* anyway in case you want to take a look. (No answer to my question of whether the Carlyle crew had checked out Charlie B’s.)

More questions? Yes. Have ‘em.

Would Carlyle actually benefit if it loses to the city? (And is this the reason they didn’t do well before trial? ‘Cause they didn’t need to?) Since Algonquin proposed to buy Western Water, the three companies, regardless of the outcome of the eminent domain proceeding, then wouldn’t Carlyle be better off getting paid from both the city and Algonquin? Or does Algonquin then take Carlyle to court? Messy.

Alright, other themes from trial. So far, only the city’s witnesses have testified. The picture they’re painting is that the utility is in dire straits and desperate for repairs, but instead of putting money into fixes, the private owners are pocketing it.

Of course, when Mountain’s own engineers take the stand, they may testify that the city cherry-picked photos of rotting pipes. They might say most of the pipes are actually alright, although I’m not sure how they will contest the high leakage rate.

Time is proving to be a focus in this trial, too. Judge Karen Townsend is keeping track of the minutes, and the lawyers are paying close attention. Here’s an order that explains the reason.

Shoot, I want to say more here about the lawyers and, ahem, #condemnationwear, but I’ll do that another time. Calling it a day, unlike all the attorneys and paralegals, who are probably working right now.

Good night.

– Keila Szpaller

P.S. The photo is of Joe Conner, taken by Missoulian photo editor Kurt Wilson.

*Updated with correct doc. Sorry!

Nuts over wrenches

At least some Mountain Water Co. employees aren’t happy with the city of Missoula, that’s for sure.

One thing that rankled some of the staff was a comment at a meeting from Scott Stearns, a lawyer who is representing the city in its eminent domain lawsuit against Mountain Water and owner the Carlyle Group.

Greg Gullickson, a senior accountant at Mountain, explained his irritation:

“Being referred to as a wrench turner, or whatever it is that I do, the arrogance of that tone … I don’t know where that comes from.”

The employees are pleased with Liberty Utilities, though, which has proposed to buy the water utility. This fall, the CEO of Liberty’s parent company was in town.

My colleague Dave Erickson @david_erickson reminded me that CEO Ian Robertson also had referred to wrenches:

“We’re the guys with the wrenches in our hands, and that’s an important distinguishing factor between Carlyle and (utility companies),” Robertson said.

It’s got to be wrenching for the crew at Liberty and parent company Algonquin to watch the condemnation case. Algonquin agreed to buy Mountain as part of a trio of utilities regardless of the outcome of the case, according to Carlyle.

Two for the price of three, anyone? Just kidding. I don’t know if that’s the way it’d shake out. You might feel like a tool if you engineered a deal that went that way, though.

Anyway, let’s get back to the first comment that got people going. Stearns said this in response to the charge his comment was arrogant:

“The folks who turn wrenches are hugely important to Mountain Water, and … the City wants to fund operations – pipes and pumps – not executives in California and (Washington), D.C.”

Here’s his full statement at the meeting, the one that made people go nuts over wrenches:

“If you work at the West Broadway building, at Mountain Water, we want to hire you. If you’re one of the 35 or so wrench turners, or whatever it is you do, we want the water system and we need water system employees to help us out.”

Trial starts in just a few days, and someone is going to get screwed.

All for now.

– Keila Szpaller

*Missoulian file photo of a wrench made with a 3D printer.

*A roundup of recent words on Krakauer’s “Missoula”

1.  This week (actually last week*), the Montana Kaimin calls for transparency from University of Montana officials:

The Montana Kaimin Editorial board asks the University of Montana to release the files regarding the Student Conduct Code hearing of former Montana Grizzlies quarterback Jordan Johnson.

2.  Doubleday plans to release no advanced reading copies. Barbara Theroux at Fact and Fiction said if Jon Krakauer wants a reading, she’ll suggest a community forum.

Theroux also said interest in Krakauer’s book about campus rape is “not on the high level.”

“When a new book is announced by James Lee Burke, we sell books all across the world, and we have lots of, ‘How much is it?’ ‘I need a signed copy,'” she said.

“That’s not what’s going on with this one.”

3. The list of people saying the bestselling author didn’t contact them prior to writing the book is pretty long. It includes UM President Royce Engstrom, Missoula County Attorney Kirsten Pabst and former County Attorney Fred Van Valkenburg, Mayor John Engen, police chief Mike Brady, and former police chief Mark Muir.

In an email, a Doubleday spokesperson did not confirm the author didn’t reach out to those people.

When I reached him by email, Muir was not pleased about being left out. I quoted his email in this story, but here are his full remarks:

No, Krakauer never reached out to me or anyone I know personally.  Unfortunately, I suspect that much like the DOJ investigative findings, his work will be crafted as mostly one-sided.  The DOJ, as you may know, never interviewed even a single MPD officer or detective about any single specific sex crime reported to the MPD.
If Krakauer has taken the same approach,  then once again the community (and the nation) will only hear one side of these difficult cases that arise in virtually every community in the nation.  If that’s so, this community get short-changed twice over.
DOJ singled out Missoula as the first campus community on the sex assault issue and will then use the outcome here to force the hand with other cities and universities.
While I don’t disagree with the capacity for improvement across the country, I still take issue with the unethical bullying tactics DOJ has used under AG Holder.  Hopefully, the new AG can realign the compass and get onto a calmer, clearer path.

4. An editorial talking about reform at UM. 

5. My story talking with marketers who believe “Missoula” will give Missoula a blemish.

6. The latest in Krakauer’s lawsuit trying to release records.

All for now. I’m off on a road trip for the day with reporter @kathrynhaake and photographer Tom Bauer.

– Keila Szpaller

*Reposted. This post from Feb. 25 was lost in a transfer from one server to another. I’m posting the recovered file here.

Changing up the beats at the Missoulian

My colleague Martin Kidston is now covering City Hall AND the Missoula County Courthouse, as well as development, ’cause he likes to see buildings go up around town.

How about that? Last night*, the council appointed Patrick Weasel Head to replace outgoing Ward 4 Councilwoman Caitlin Copple.

*Follow @martinkidston for #mslacc:
martinkidstonFeb 23, 7:57pm via TweetDeck

“God, geeks, gays, love them all,” Copple says in giving her goodbye; Ward 4 vote now up.

I’m covering the University of Montana now, but I’ll continue to cover the city’s eminent domain case against Mountain Water Co. and the Carlyle Group. The latest is Carlyle again loses in court.

Two true things about condemnation so far? The city is paying a lot, much more than it projected. Carlyle is losing a lot, at least on motions before trial.

The beat change is old news, but we were locked out of the blogs for a while. (The technical people know the reason, and I do not.)

A few people have wondered how the switch came about. Our editor asks us periodically if anyone wants to change things up, and I’ve pretty much loved covering City Hall.

This year is a city election year, and I’m usually curious about who is running again, and who the new candidates are, and which councilors are supporting which newbies. This year, not so much.

I found myself dreading the elections and, even before filing opened, tired of the political narrative in Missoula, maybe still fending off the aftertaste of 2014. From the bird’s eye view, the entitled progressives meet incompetent conservatives, and they’re off to the races.

Obviously, both sides have delivered candidates who work hard and do cool things for Missoula. Council president Marilyn Marler muscled through the sidewalk subsidy, one of the more monstrous pieces of business I’ve seen go through council. She and some other councilors spent a lot of time and sweat in direct response to constituents. Councilman Adam Hertz studied the city’s health insurance, and he presented a valuable analysis of how it compares to the norm. I doubt the council majority will make adjustments based on his work, but the numbers are good to know nonetheless.

Either way, it’s time to read someone else’s take on the narrative, and I’ve nearly tap-danced in the break room to see Martin’s stories. He’s been covering the Mayor’s Downtown Advisory Committee, which I never did, and it’s interesting stuff. Here’s the latest from Sunday on trying to clean up downtown.

I’m likewise tap dancing about my own new world. Scientists! F-bombs! Aquaponics! Blue hair! Sea turtles! 

My first foray into campus life was Love Fest at the University Center, where students wore condoms taped to their jackets, and they handed out flowers and “make out kits.” Toto, we are not in Council Chambers anymore.


They’ve got free speech boards posted around campus. (I’ve seen two, so far, and both had F-bombs written in very large letters.) They’ve got professors who are doing cool research in the national parks. (On Martians; I’m not kidding.) A Dining Services staffer who creates a sushi bar every Friday. (Actually, I don’t know if it’s Dining Services. It’s the cafeteria in the UC. I imagine I’ll figure out the name sooner or later.)

Martin’s been more and more interested in development, and covering city and county fits well with that interest. He isn’t into the Love Fest kind of story, and there’s less of it in local government.

So here we are. Sorry, Geoff and whoever else, for the gap in posts.

Enjoy the breath of fresh air in local government reporting, and, I hope, some interesting news from campus. I’ll keep posting here, both local government stories and pieces about UM, and Martin may join me as well.

– Keila Szpaller

*I reposted this entry from Feb. 24 because it was lost in a server move. I don’t remember which of Martin’s tweets I had pasted here, so it might not be the original one. Just letting you know.